Talk:Local class field theory
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 129.2.56.27 in topic Untitled
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled edit
i am insufficiently wikipedia-savvy to fix this, but the title is typoed. No one says "classfield theory." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.98.247 (talk) 19:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well some people do write "classfield theory". But "class field theory" is certainly much more common and modern. I'll try moving it, I highly doubt there will be any controversy, especially since the article on class field theory is called just that. RobHar (talk) 19:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! 129.2.56.27 (talk) 12:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
plans: make precise statements of results. give history of proofs.68.34.98.247 (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Local class field theory/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| State main theorems, history section, mention various approaches, explicit local class field theory. RobHar (talk) 23:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 02:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 02:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC)