Talk:Live from Clear Channel Stripped 2008

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Lovinqxcherry in topic Should this be included in the chronology of releases?

Should this be included in the chronology of releases?

edit

I don’t think that this should be included in the chronology of releases, because Swift did not release this herself, but someone else released it without her approval. 67.158.55.113 (talk) 14:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The chronology is just of Taylor Swift albums and this is a Taylor Swift album. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 18:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
i also agree that it shouldn't be included in the chronology. taylor did not approve of this release and keeping it in is only disrespecting her. Lovinqxcherry (talk) 00:50, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Which policy or guideline at Wikipedia says that we should respect Taylor Swift? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 00:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
some dude told me i forgot his name told me that wikipedia is based on facts. so if it's a fact that taylor did not approve of this release and basically disowned it then that should be taken into consideration of why it's even in her chronology in the first place cause it should be a chronology of her work, not releases that she had no involvement in. xoxo Lovinqxcherry (talk) 04:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
i meant denounced it not disowned but u get the idea Lovinqxcherry (talk) 04:50, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
It may well be a fact that she dislikes it. That is represented in the text of the article. Disliking something doesn't remove it from history. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 04:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Koavf: Keep in mind that Lovinqxcherry is edit warring [1] [2] [3] [4]. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
stop slandering me i'm a minor Lovinqxcherry (talk) 04:14, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
"history" 33 sales isn't history. and that's facts Lovinqxcherry (talk) 04:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply