Talk:Live at the London Palladium

Non-free content guidelines

As Wikipedia:NFC#Text notes, "Extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited." Fair use allows brief quotations to illustrate points. We cannot copy half of a review without infringing on the copyright...or, as with the Playboy quote, more than half. I have removed infringing material, but rather than simply deleting it opted to attempt to pare it down to a more defensible amount. Contributors here are, of course, more than welcome to choose different segments of text to incorporate into the article, but the entire quotations should not be restored, as such substantial portions are problematic for copyright reasons. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Live at the London Palladium/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

==Re-assessment== Start class: Y A reasonably complete infobox Y A lead section giving an overview of the album Y A track listing Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient) Y Categorisation at least by artist and year C class: Y All the start class criteria Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section) N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians. B class: N All the C class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians Y No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. Y No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow It needs a bit more citation to really be close to a GA and maybe some balancing of reviews as this is full of praise without any criticism of the album's style or work. But it's still impressive. Some sentences still need citation, but after these issues are cleared up, give it a peer review and examine it for GA status! Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Re-examine: Well, some of the things in the medely don't have songwriting credits. Could that be fixed up for the B? Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 06:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 22:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)