Talk:Little Chute Windmill

POV

Kermit814

Knock yourself out on the POV issue, although I tried to cut out obvious cases and thought that it generally just presented facts.

Jhuiting (talk) 19:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm just saying we'll have to be careful here. The windmill does not even exist yet and the article already includes features such as trails which haven't even fully entered the planning stage yet, much less funding. Also, it's not like the windmill is being entirely welcomed into the community with open arms. There have been controversies from the start about everything from public funding to location. The article is a good start and I'm a big fan of your anti-vandalism on other Fox Valley wiki-pages. Just make sure that the site remains not only informational, but balanced and realistic. Kermit814 (talk) 19:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

NRHP

What is the historical district for this? If it doesn't exist how can it be on the NRHP? The only two districts I see for Little Chute are Little Chute Locks and Canal Historic District and Cedars Lock and Dam Historic District. --Dual Freq (talk) 03:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

It needs to be fixed. It was going to be adjacent the canal, but no longer is that the case. Jhuiting (talk) 01:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Infobox

{{Infobox Windmill}} should be used in this article, but probably best to wait until it has actually been built. Photographs would be useful too. Mjroots (talk) 06:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Little Chute Windmill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080826033724/http://www.parks.sfgov.org/wcm_recpark/Notice/MurphyWindmill.pdf to http://www.parks.sfgov.org/wcm_recpark/Notice/MurphyWindmill.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)