Talk:Little Aston

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 94.197.217.16 in topic Puff piece

Boundary Suggestion Reverting incorrect content removal edit

A unregistered user (90.196.28.32) has reverted my edit of the southern boundary of Little Aston.

I was brought up in Streetly and although it is counter intuitive (because Streetly Village was always to me Burnett Road Shops) it now appears that officially the Staffordshire Authority refer to that south east tip as Little Aston - as evidenced by the street sign (see Google maps) [1]

I don't like it because it 'feels wrong', and elements of the Little Aston residents may not want to include this area in the 'exclusive' area, however it does appear to be factual - which is what Wikipedia aims to achieve. If anyone has any comments please add them here but I propose reverting the reverts to the more factual rather than perceived area.

johnmark†(talk to me) 20:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Little Aston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Puff piece edit

Most of this article is a pointless puff piece by self serving writers with far too much time on their hands. It reads more like a marketing brochure written by an estate agent than a factual and informative article. 94.197.217.16 (talk) 08:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply