Talk:List of trademarks owned by the Church of Scientology and its affiliates

This page was proposed for deletion by Chidgk1 (talk · contribs) on 24 March 2023.
It was contested by Grorp (talk · contribs) with the comment:
I have plans to expand this article with content about CofS trademarks and the relationship to their litigation history.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of trademarks owned by the Church of Scientology and its affiliates article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Scientology Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Flag in katakana edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I see that the word "flag" in katakana is copyrighted, but the kanji for flag is listed next to the entry. Has Scientology copyrighted the kanji as well (it's not listed on their copyright page)? I don't speak fluent Japanese, but I know that the katakana for the English word flag and the kanji for the Japanese word flag are different. If it is the case that Scientology doesn't hold the copyright for the kanji, could someone add the katakana for "flag"? I don't know what it is. 146.7.202.42 02:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

That would be "Fu-ra-gu".... click here. I suspect someone over at the CoS didn't know the difference between Kanji and Katakana... I also have grave doubts that the word "flag" can be copyrighted anyway. Trademarked, perhaps, and even then only for specific purposes, but not copyrighted. wikipediatrix 02:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of trademarks owned by the Church of Scientology and its affiliates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic