Talk:List of supertall skyscrapers
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of supertall skyscrapers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612111832/http://www.sakaaltimes.com/SakaalTimesBeta/20100608/5075314813725948178.htm to http://www.sakaaltimes.com/SakaalTimesBeta/20100608/5075314813725948178.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Why are there incomplete skyscrapers on this list
edit@Robynthehode I'm not talking about buildings that are near completion. I know the story with these Chinese skyscrapers. They are not near completion. Particularly, Golden Finance 117 & Wuhan Greenland Center. If no one objects, I will remove them. Itrytohelp32 (talk) 15:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
What happened with the graphs?
editThey all look weird now, and I have no idea how to fix it. If anyone has the time to, can they please? Thank you <3 --: 125.59.226.79 (talk) 09:32, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- I think the problem with the table is fixed now.--Kallichore (talk) 20:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Burj Khalifa is "supertall"?
editThis list gives a definition of "supertall" as buildings from 300 to 600 meters tall, but the top of the list contains a "megatall" building. Why isn't this just called a list of all the buildings taller than 300m? That's what it is. I wouldn't want to remove the Burj Khalifa from the list, nor give it its own list of megatall buildings, which would be a list of one. Why do we call this a list of "supertall" buildings when that's not what it is? —MiguelMunoz (talk) 21:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Merge proposal
editSupport the proposal to merge Supertall building with this list, as it is nothing more than a definition. Klbrain (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
I also support the proposal. I would go further - we should overhaul our entire handling of very tall buildings, to move away from boosterism and jargon like 'megatall'. A lot of the sources for the definitions we currently apply are not independent, but rather come from organisations with a vested interest in hyping up skyscrapers. GenevieveDEon (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
WTC Towers/Destroyed Supertall Towers
editThe original World Trade Center towers were supertall towers, shouldn’t they be included on this list? Jeremy099 (talk) 01:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)