Talk:List of statues on Charles Bridge
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of statues on Charles Bridge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
editThis page need some serious work. I'd say start off with just catagorizing the satues themselves, but then we need to clarify the information on each one and get reliable resources. NeoChrono Ryu 19:40, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Format
editNothing to do wuith the romans!!!!!!!!!!!
Do we want to begin each paragraph on an article with a level 4 heading or just a bullet? It currently starts with one and then uses the other. I'd make it consistent but I don't know which one to use. RJFJR 13:13, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
- I am in the process of creating stubs for each of the statues, which means details about individual works can be moved from this list to their respective articles. Ideally, this list would be a sortable, formatted table with images, dates, artists, and a brief description of each statue, leaving more in-depth coverage for the articles about specific statues. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Update: There are now stubs for each of the statues. I also created a navigation box to link all of the articles together. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:50, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Content
editJust to note-the offense taken at the placement of the Hebrew phrase around the crucifix is not "misconstrued." The letters were added to the statue with the explicit purpose of offending, and they continue thus to offend. Just a note.140.180.24.8 13:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
References
editGood link on the bottom, but this page needs more references. For institute, I find it slightly suspicious the statue of St. Wenceslas was commissioned by the Prague Institute for the Blind.--ScottieB (talk) 13:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism
editThe change made on 1 July 2011 00:44 regarding the origins of the Hebrew letters on the Crucifix and Cavalry appears to be nothing but vandalism. diff of the change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.48.137 (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of statues on Charles Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040805062457/http://www.karluv-most.cz/bridge_03.htm to http://www.karluv-most.cz/bridge_03.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)