Talk:List of stars in Camelopardalis
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Lithopsian in topic Splitting proposal
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the 20 Camelopardalis page were merged into List of stars in Camelopardalis on 6 November 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the 19 Camelopardalis page were merged into List of stars in Camelopardalis on 14 March 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Notability edit
20 Camelopardalis appears to fail when evaluated against Wikipedia:Notability_(astronomical_objects)#Basic_notability, so I've tagged it for merge. Presumably that's also true of other objects which currently do not have articles, so it might be a good idea to de-link them rather than implicitly suggest they should have articles. -- Beland (talk) 22:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Splitting proposal edit
I propose that 20 Cam be split into a separate page called 20 Camelopardalis. There's been substantial info about star. 400Weir (talk) 21:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Has anything substantial been published about this star in the six months since the article was merged? Perhaps add a few links to the publications that you feel would make it notable? My own searches found nothing. Lithopsian (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)