This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Coronation Street, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Coronation Street and its characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Coronation StreetWikipedia:WikiProject Coronation StreetTemplate:WikiProject Coronation StreetCoronation Street articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
Who decided on this, merging the whole lot. Some of these characters have cultural impact on britian. Google some of them. And someone merged every single one of them Raintheone (talk) 15:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, I think it should be the minor charcters, not every character, that isn't very good, people want to know information on their best charcters . Not a cut down version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.212.24 (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
But these aren't cut down versions. These represent the full content of the individual articles. I can't imagine anyone would have any objections to unmerging particular characters as and when someone wants to take the time to re-write them in order to demonstrate notability and ensure that the content isn't just in-universe plot summary... But as it is, older character articles were being nominated for deletion & redirected to List of past Coronation Street characters on an increasingly regular basis, which obviously preserved no content whatsoever. I think this is a much better alternative to that. Frickative19:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree with you, the articles should be expanded to show more notability. Some of them, like Elsie and Hilda, were considered iconic characters for decades, and others, like Len, were major players for decades. I guess the lack of notability on their pages hinders them. --JamesB3 (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
