Talk:List of opera companies in Europe

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

"non-exhaustive"? edit

Do you mean 'inclusive'? --Kleinzach (talk) 06:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

By non-exhaustive I really meant it was incomplete. As in there are a lot of other companies out there not on the list. But this is a list that is inclusive in the sense that those companies listed only need to meet the general wikipedia notability guidelines and be actually located in Europe. Also take a look at what I did to List of North American opera companies.Nrswanson (talk) 06:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK. That's inclusive (opposite exclusive, selected etc.). Your maps and linking are great! (Hope there are no mistakes!) By the way, please indent your comments. Gives everyone a better impression etc. No indent and your comments (or someone else's) may be missed. --Kleinzach (talk) 07:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thank you and I will try to remember to indent for now on. I am sure there are a few mistakes as I am not perfect. One of the problems is that sometimes wikipedia articles don't use the actual official names of opera companies and haven't bothered to redirect official titles to the name of the article. In the case of European companies this is especially true with the foriegn language titles not being redirected to the article on the company whose name has been transliterated into English. On the North American page I have found some issues like the official title of San Diego Opera is really The San Diego Opera Association. So when I listed it under the official title it came up as red. You get the idea. It is going to take a while to go through the whole list and make sure that some red linked companies don't already have articles under a different name.Nrswanson (talk) 07:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I've been doing quite a lot of them as you've seen. Almost all major companies should have articles and you can search for them. --Kleinzach (talk) 07:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you I appriciate that. I have just changed all of the city names to the English versions of them.Nrswanson (talk) 07:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gars edit

Gars is in Germany not Austria - or is the name wrong? --Kleinzach (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is also a Gars in Austria. Here is the link to the company's website. click hereNrswanson (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I just found a wikipedia article on the town calling it Gars am Kamp.Nrswanson (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Some fixed column widths to create a better-looking table with consistency??? edit

I adjusted the "Company" col width to 200px. It creates wrapping when the title is longer. Now, we could also fix the "Theatres" and "Cities" columns too to fit across the page.

Overall, I think it would make the whole thing look a lot better looking as well as making it easier to read. Any thoughts before I (or anyone else: takers?) proceeds? Viva-Verdi (talk) 22:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good idea. I say go for it.4meter4 (talk) 22:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
I don't see the need for almost 50 individual tables. In my opinion, a simple bullet list or a single table would work much better:
Country Company House Location
Albania National Theatre of Opera and Ballet of Albania   Tirana
Armenia Armenia National Opera and Ballet Yerevan Opera Theater Yerevan
Austria   Bregenzer Festspiele Bregenz
   
Linz State Theatre   Linz
It's a lot of work for a non-essential list. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Well, you make a good point, Michael. It seems that all the lists are set up in this way and, though I don't feel inclined to do the same with them, I've now completed the revision here. It certainly looks better, although the empty spaces jump out at one..... Viva-Verdi (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of opera companies in Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply