Talk:List of number-one digital songs of 2009 (U.S.)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of number-one digital songs of 2009 (U.S.) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Record Charts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Charts, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Record charts. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Record ChartsWikipedia:WikiProject Record ChartsTemplate:WikiProject Record ChartsRecord Charts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Digital songs

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Should the name of this article be "digital songs" not "digital singles". 1) Because that is the name of the chart, and 2) it is possible that a song not released as a single could top this chart. --Wolfer68 (talk) 02:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agree - name change is needed. - eo (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sources need to be redone!

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

ALL sources here need to be redone, due to Billboard.com's renovation (click on any current link to see the error message). Additionally, the sales figures will need to be sourced, not just the title that topped the chart in any given week. - eo (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looking at many of the sources here, they do not comfirm the #1 digital song of the week (sometimes they do). They just seem to be copied from the Hot 100 number-ones page. --Wolfer68 (talk) 23:27, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

How do you know...

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The number of sales? Where do you take those numbers? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.190.34 (talk) 23:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic