Talk:List of airship accidents

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Accidents of significant historical importance

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is this heading needed? If so, the "significant historical importance" of each entry would need to be defined. There seems to be a contradiction between the name of the list and this heading. Which is it, a list of airship accidents (covering all such accidents) or a list of only the historically significant ones (which might limit it to the Hindenburg accident)? FWIW, I favour the list of all accidents, irrespective of their (perceived) historically significance.--TraceyR (talk) 11:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of airship accidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120315080821/http://www.bedfordraob.org.uk/r101/pdfs/report_of_r101_inquiry.pdf to http://www.bedfordraob.org.uk/r101/pdfs/report_of_r101_inquiry.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Added Recent Airship Accident

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi everyone,

I just added the most recent airship accident that I'm aware of which occurred in 2017. Let me know if you think the synopsis could be improved or if you think this does not qualify as an airship accident. This is my first time contributing to a wikipedia article! So, I may have made some errors.

Thanks!Gamtoc (talk) 05:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic