Talk:List of Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia members
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Sc0ttkclark in topic How are we determining what constitutes a "Famous Sinfonian"
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia members article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
How are we determining what constitutes a "Famous Sinfonian"
editHow are we determining what constitutes a "famous Sinfonian"? Someone may be preeminent within their respective field but not with the general public. Someone such as Curuso or even Burrell may have been well known with the general public during their lifetimes but are not as widely recognized today. Any thoughts? - 768.210.193.172 (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. What really defines famous?
- I think that we should limit this list to match one in the Themes For Brotherhood. It is already quite an exhaustive list. Also, once this is done, we may want to lock this article to prevent people from vandalizing this page. By vandalizing, I mean adding themselves as famous Sinfonians when they clearly are not. - 72.237.161.217 (talk) 02:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have to say that it's necessary to require notability for each person on the list of Notable Sinfonians here. If they can't have a Wikipedia article due to Wikipedia Notability policy, then I'd say they shouldn't be here. If they can but don't have a Wikipedia article, then they should still be safe to be listed here. Any thoughts guys? - Sc0ttkclark (talk) 22:28, 11 December 2008 (UTC)