Talk:List of 19th-century British periodicals

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Relation to "Magazine" and "History of Newspaper and Magazine"

edit

I suggest that a page simply entitled "19th Century British Periodicals" be made. The British periodical is the precursor of the magazine, and yet it doesn't have a real page for itself, and is barely mentioned under the magazine title. If we make this page about the periodical, and have it linked under Magazine for the history of the magazine, it would clean this up a lot. Currently if you want information on the history of the magazine - hence, Periodical - you get a couple tiny paragraphs spread around Wiki. Allyalleycats (talk) 04:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)AllyAlleycatReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of 19th-century British periodicals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply