Talk:Light of Hope

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

CSD

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Atlantic306. In what way does this not constitute 'unambiguous advertising'? Regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 15:28, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Its just not spam, also see its been significantly edited by Worldbruce a senior editor who obviously does not regard it as spam, Atlantic306 (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm not happy with the article, and considered nominating it for deletion, but decided that was not the appropriate approach. It cites only one independent, reliable source, but at least half-a-dozen others exist, listed in the further reading section. Deletion is not cleanup. The article needs to be rewritten using those sources. Feel free to take a stab at it. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

- I've edited the current version for the time-being so its more neutral but agree a full re-write using the extra sources is needed, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic