Talk:Liferea

Latest comment: 9 months ago by MichielN in topic Comparison with other software

Image

edit

The image is a bit not up to date, isn't it? Especially does it not show the new icon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.133.94.129 (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rewording Needed

edit

"There are many other news readers available, but some of these are not available for Linux or require extra libraries to be installed." That statement needs to be reworded, or possibly even removed. It does go with what should be expected in an encylopedia. --525252a 05:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Someone must have quoted this from the project homepage.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liferea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Comparison with other software

edit

"It supports a number of different feed formats including RSS/RDF, CDF, Atom, OCS, and OPML, many of which its contemporaries cannot."

That's a pretty bold statement to make, especially without any sources to back it up, and without explaining what is to be understood by "contemporaries". Feed readers? Browsers? Email programs? Software in general? Most dedicated feed readers do support RSS/RDF, Atom, and OPML. I can imagine support for CDF or OCS is somewhat limited, but that still does not justify the "many" in "many of which" here. MichielN (talk) 21:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply