Talk:Lie point symmetry

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

The example given is way too simple! I mean: it's just separable first order ODE. Can we cook up some examples that are more "interesting", for instance a 2nd order ode which is not readily tractable by other techniques? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.126.8 (talk) 19:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

My goal was not to give examples beyond understanding but to show simply an infinitesimal approach that leads to Lie symmetries. But why not to add also a more complicated example? you are right. I will think of such an example but if you have some suggestions, they are more than welcome. Baub (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lie point symmetry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply