Talk:Leszynski naming convention

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Microsoft Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Who is this Leszynski that (presumably) came up with this notation? » Christopher | Talk | 08:42, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

 Stan Leszynski, who is a database design consultant.  http://www.leszynski.com
 Mike Simpson 14:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Disadvantages edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I've added a "Disadvantages" section. I've wikilinked Case Sensitivity for "mixedCase" but is there a better wikilink than that? I tried "mixed case" literally but that went straight to Capitalization which didn't seem such a good match. (Northernhenge (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC))Reply

How about CamelCase? Classical geographer (talk) 07:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's spot on. I'd never heard of that term before. Thank you. Northernhenge (talk) 10:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Advantages edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The noted advantage of the database being self-documenting is not true.

One of the objectives of self-documenting code is for it to be readable, which Hungarian notation and thereby Leszynski notation is not according to ^[1]

Jespertp (talk) 07:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

References edit

^ * Jones, Derek M. (2009). The New C Standard: A Cultural and Economic Commentary (PDF). Addison-Wesley. p. 727. ISBN 0-201-70917-1.

Add topic

[1] * Jones, Derek M. (2009). The New C Standard: A Cultural and Economic Commentary (PDF). Addison-Wesley. p. 727. ISBN 0-201-70917-1.

[1]