Talk:Leon W. Johnson/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Auntieruth55 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 21:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

First section
  • second sentence is hinky
     Y Fixed after looking up "hinky" in the Wiktionary. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • link second lieutenant
      Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Mitchell Field, New York, (missing comma after NY)
     Y Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
WWII
  • Dab
     Y Disambiguated . Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • On 14 May 1943 comma
     Y Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • The B-24, carrying incendiaries, came under particularly heavy attack from German fighters, as they were unable to stay close enough the B-17s to be protected by their gunfire, and had to open up their own formation to attack; five of the eight aircraft shot down were B-24s. confusing to an air fighting noob
  • the attack on the Ploesti oil fields in Romania....the attack on the Romanian Ploesti oil fields is possibly more readable
      Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Andy Rooney knew he was a general before he was a general?
    Yes, but he didn't like hanging around the bomber outfits, because it was too depressing. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Postwar
Nice! Let me know when you get to this. auntieruth (talk) 23:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    y
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    nicely done. interesting and concise. auntieruth (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply