Talk:Legion of the Lost

Untitled

This seems rather full of weasel words and whatnot. Can someone give this a look for POV? --Breathstealer 12:23, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

the text sounds as though it were taken from a pitch to a publishing executive. This article feels more like an advertisment than giving any real information.

the article comes directly from legionofthelost.com

Sounds like copy from the inside jacket or back cover of the book. Not encyclopedic IMHO Cfpresley 20:08, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

the article is a direct copy from legionofthelost.com, though the reference has been deleted. additionally, either legionofthelost.com has copied the French Foreign Legion article or vice versa. somebody should ascertain whether that article violates copyright.

So... this is a book? I tried to clean it up and delete all the clearly copied stuff. — mæstro ^t/c, 10:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

All, this latest revision was inserted by the author, myself, Jaime Salazar. I see nothing wrong with this format. The previous text, taken from the official website (mine) is not copywrited, and if so, I give permission for it to be used. Let's stop the bickering and stick with this revision please.

Revised this article after reading today's NYTimes article on The Legion, and following its links. I removed florid, public-relations language from the article without altering its informative intention or content. Tapered (talk) 05:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

COI tag (October 2021)

Numerous edits by an editor with a name very similar to that of the author of the book. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)