Talk:Lake Padden

Untitled

thanks Docu for helping. CallMeAndrew (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Tone concerns

I've tagged the article as having tone issues as I think it is written in quite a promotional/ travel guide-ish manner, not the formal, business like tone described in Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Tone. Guest9999 (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

did u do that edit and put in the reference thing? thanks. plus u kinda talk too intelligent. its hard to understand. but i try. CallMeAndrew (talk) 02:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Rewrote the article to reflect a more professional tone. There are still vague statements using terms such as popular but I will try to find articles or official documentation to support them. Lonelymiesarchie (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

First two sentences don't mesh...

First sentence identifies it as a lake, than second sentence refers to a park. I am aware that the lake is within a park, but others might not and thusly be comfused. A seperate entire entry might be warrented for info about the park itself, as this entry is titled specific to the lake. Short of that it would probably be worth mentioning that the lake is stocked for fishing, and that motorized boats are not allowed. Some more statics about the lake would be nice, if they are available, otherwise perhaps shifting this information to an article about the entire park which includes info about the lake would be better, as there is very little information regarding the lake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GusgusMadrona (talk • contribs) 04:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)