Talk:Lake Lure, North Carolina
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
The reference to the "town" of Buffalo is incorrect. Buffalo was the name of the community that was buried under Lake Lure. It was never incorporated as a municipality.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lake Lure, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Suggestion of splitting between the municipality and the lake edit
This page mixes the Municipality and the body of water with the same name. I propose a split to improve the entity resolution of the article and contents. This would also improve linking to Wikidata. If not you, then who? (talk) 17:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)