Talk:Lad, A Dog/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by AnmaFinotera in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria edit

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    I made a few minor copy-edits
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Charterhouse as used in 4 references goes to a dismabiguation page with no mention of teh publisher, please remove Wikilinks.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I am happy to pass this, but please note the point about the Charterhouse disambiguation above. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Great, thanks. Fixed the Charterhouse links :-) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply