This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I welcome any further edits, however, I am not affiliated with the project, just noticing the some customers of my job site is using it and found no reference at Wikipedia. The project's site seems to provide a most crisp and clear description, no need to fuzz it up for no reason but keep it to a generic but adequate description, please. By Simgron on 07:14, 1 June 2009