Talk:LGBTQ people in Mexico

(Redirected from Talk:LGBT in Mexico)
Latest comment: 29 days ago by Trystan in topic Merge proposal
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on LGBT people in Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on LGBT people in Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge. Closing unopposed merge proposal as proposer, per WP:MERGECLOSE.--Trystan (talk) 12:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I propose that LGBTQ topics in Mexico be merged into this article so that there is a single WP:BROADCONCEPT article for LGBTQ people in Mexico. The "people" title is preferable for consistency with LGBTQ people in Canada, LGBTQ people in the United States, etc. All "LGBTQ topics" are about LGBTQ people (the history of LGBTQ people, the rights of LGBTQ people, the culture of LGBTQ people, the demographics of LGBTQ people), so there is no need to refer vaguely to "topics". If the resulting article following the merge is too long, additional sub-topics can be spun off and kept here in WP:SUMMARYSTYLE.--Trystan (talk) 13:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm okay with that. Lewisguile (talk) 10:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
There's also a timeline in eswiki. --MikutoH talk! 23:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.