Talk:Kontakt (software)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Synthfiend in topic Kompakt stub vs Kontakt article

Kompakt stub vs Kontakt article edit

This article is not notable, except in the context of Kontakt, which does not yet have its own article. I propose either re-naming and expanding this article, or moving/merging it with a new Kontakt article that I can draft. Not sure which course of action fits best within Wiki guidelines though, can other editors please weigh in? synthfiend (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Either method, merge and redirect or move, is fine. The issue is finding WP:RS sources. If you have some sources covering Kontakt, please go ahead and change the article's focus. Dialectric (talk) 17:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
I began looking at this article due to its long-term notability query, and came to a similar conclusion, that Kompakt appears worthy of coverage here only in the context of Kontakt (sampler), which exists only as a redirect rather than an article. Synthfiend, if you think Kontakt can be demonstrated to be notable, one approach (seeking to preserve edit histories) might be (1) to add a section on Kontakt above Kompakt Program, then in quick succession (2) nominate the Kontakt (sampler) redirect for CSD G6 deletion; (3) reorient this article to be about Kontakt more than Kompakt; (4) rename the article to Kontakt (sampler). AllyD (talk) 09:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Per AllyD suggestion I have added a Kontakt section above Kompakt Program. I am not, however, familiar with the process for nominating the Kontakt (sampler) redirect for CSD G6 deletion. I will gladly work on revising and expanding the article to be more about Kontakt.synthfiend (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Kontakt is absolutely notable. It has an almost monopoly on Sampling based instruments, and its a monpoly that NI exploits ruthlessly. If you release sample based instruments, chances are its a release for Kontakt requiring the instrument maker to either license Kontakt, or require the user to obtain a license. It may well be the most important piece of software on the planet for composers and producers. Duckmonster (talk) 12:06, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have moved the article and updated accordingly. Feel free to expand it. synthfiend (talk) 14:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply