Talk:KnowledgeBench
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Yahya Abdal-Aziz in topic Value of this article
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Hi,
I'm guessing this entry has been marked for deletion as it has been deemed too much like advertising. It was not my intention to make this an advert, just to provide a brief description of the company and product. If anyone can highlight any areas of the entry that are particularly troublesome, I'd be happy to modify them.
Many thanks,
Skinneal (talk) 12:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'd suggest including third party sources to back up some of your claims - such as the fact that the product is used by companies such as Astra Zeneca. Booglamay (talk) 16:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Value of this article
editWhy is this article worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia? I can answer only for myself, but I was interested to read it as:
- an example of a software product
- an example of a tool for product invention
- an example of a tool supporting process manufacturing
- an example of an expert systems application
- its potential to further objective (e.g. quantitative) color theory
- its potential application to paint formulation
For these reasons, I feel that it is appropriate informaton to include in Wikipedia. And lest anyone suspect otherwise, I have no connection to the owners or creators of Knowledgebench. yoyo (talk) 10:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)