Talk:Klonoa

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Actor/Actress edit

Maybe just maybe maybe even a 90% out of a 100% chance of the english version of Klonoa Heroes: Legend of the Star Medal making it possible for english voice actors for once, so don't shoot before ya know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SoundPound500000 (talkcontribs)

In Klonoa Beach Volleyball, Klonoa spoke English, probably other languages too. So it's still possible that Kumiko Watanabe is not the only one who voices Klonoa in his EVERY appearance. But, I could be wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.25.42.3 (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

klonoafanclub.com? edit

Anyone know what happened to the Klonoa Fan club page and forums? Did the owner just forget to renew his account or is it gone for good?


This should explain some things.

http://bigcn401.110mb.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3

Rumor of Klonoa's brother edit

I'm a little confused about the inclusion of this: "It is rumored that Klonoa has a brother named #REDIRECT Zephile( Pronounced ZEE-FLY-EEL)and a girl friend named Noruna." Why was it put in, and what's the basis for the rumor? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.162.103.194 (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

An article for the character edit

There's actually so much to give information about the character, Klonoa. Why not making an article about him? Nickie 25 (talk) 07:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Previous Article was more complete edit

The Klonoa Wikipedia page I saw back in 2005-2007 was brilliantly done and nearly complete, but for some reason, now I see it completely butchered into near nothingness. What happened to the page? It had information regarding the various Klonoa franchises, the description of the language,synopsis of the manga with screenshots, etc. Seriously, what happened? Would someone please reverse this monstrous edit? Maybe using webarchive. The fact theat Klonoa has been remade for the Wii means there's still public interest and therefore should have a quality WIKIPEDIA page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidneykwchan TX2 (talkcontribs) 16:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

My guess is that since the old page was about the character Klonoa, someone though it would be better to delete that article and make one about the Klonoa series instead. And in the process he for some reason deleted almost all information. 81.231.172.247 (talk) 11:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Well, its botched into nothingness because some asshats on Wikipedia decide they don't want to listen to the users that edit the pages and go ahead and delete them. I was a member trying to protect this page along with the character page. But NOOOOOOO apparently it is not relevant to ANYTHING, Klonoa is just a freaking cat, nothing special for Wikipedia. Same should apply to Sonic, Tails, Knuckles, Mario, they're not important, they're just characters in video games IMO. "The sum of all human knowledge," my ass. If it is the sum of all human knowledge, then why are perfectly good articles being deleted? Tails0600 (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, cant someone with enough time on his hands just try to find the information that was in the old article and copy-paste it back in this one?Rattis1 (talk) 11:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • We can, and I might happen to have the original text, however, the Wikipedia people already deleted the Klonoa(Character) article, putting it here instead. Basically, either we don't have a Series of Character page. They'll just delete it again. That, and other articles, like Guntz's were also already deleted... There's no way we can get them back unless a Sysop or Bureaucrat wants to dig them out of the grave. Tails0600 (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
    • I was never logged in before, and, since its my opinions, and we all have rights to that, I'll make myself known. Tails0600 (talk) 06:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

character articles edit

It should become standard practice on wikipedia to not separate a character and it's franchise since that would be the bulk of that article's relevant information. Sure, the article should include information on the character and its world, but it should be a small fraction compared to actual events and quotations from the creators. We must keep in mind that in order to be professional about this it is of the utmost importance to make clear distinctions between reality and fiction.

also Klonoa is totally a dog, don't even argue —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.106.115.35 (talk) 20:53, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Jillius, Suiryu and Ghadius edit

I think they should be deleted from the characters section

they are key characters in the games they appeared ? yes, they were

BUT they only appeared in one game, and as this article talks about the series as a whole, i think only the recurring characters should be here, with Ghadius and cia. being in their respective game articles

If we gonna include Key characters who only appeared once, the living museum from Moonligh Museum should be here too, as it's the game's main antagonist.


Jillius made an appearance in the comic, so I don't mind him too much, but still...

177.31.51.106 (talk) 04:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)I don't have an account hereReply

Happy 15th Birthday edit

Did you guys know that this is the 15th year of the Klonoa series? And if any of the guys that are working with the Klonoa series are reading this, "make a anniversary game with Klonoa, Lolo, and Popka in it. And make it bring back alot of old stuff. Oh and it would be fun if the major enemies (Ghadius, Garlen, Joka, Janga, and Bagoo) joined forces for revenge". 74.78.77.173 (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

webcomic article? edit

hello? Would anyone want to do an article about the webcomic? Visokor (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Puffery and original research edit

I removed a rather bold claim that one of these games invented 2.5D. Maybe it was the first 2.5D game on a Nintendo console, but it's going to require a very solid citation to claim that it was the first ever. In fact, the whole section that describes these games is full of original research. If I remember, I'll come back later and clean up it once it's had enough time to be referenced. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Klonoa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Klonoa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply