Talk:King Leir

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elizabethan theatre (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elizabethan theatre, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elizabethan theatreWikipedia:WikiProject Elizabethan theatreTemplate:WikiProject Elizabethan theatreElizabethan theatre articles

Comment edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is this really "Cordella"? If so, let's make it "Cordella [sic]". --Chinasaur

The Early English Books Online (EEBO) database attributes this play to Michael Drayton (1563-1631). Caliginous (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello; the link directing to the comparison of both, Leir and Lear seems to be dead end? Could someone check out? Thx! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.250 (talk) 21:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

What happens to Cordelia in this? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is she killed off like in Shakespeare's? Or does it imply she will become Queen following the account of Geophry of Monmouth?--JaredMithrandir (talk) 05:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Logan and Smith edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

These sources are unnamed and cannot be found. Logan and Smith does not refer to On Reading Shakespeare by Logan Pearsall Smith, because that is only 177 pages in length.

Shakeeespeare (talk) 17:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic