Talk:Kepler-20

Main sequence

The article said, "As of 2011, it has not yet been determined whether this is a main-sequence star"

Given its radius, mass, and spectral type, there's really nothing else that it can be besides a main-sequence star. I don't think it would be presumptious to list Kepler-20 as G8V. 71.29.12.46 (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

I wouldn't know what else it could be either and that claim is currently uncited. I've tagged it with a citation-needed tag to see if anything turns up. --JorisvS (talk) 22:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Sixth planet?

Looks like somebody's going to need to work the results of http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06836 into the article... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kepler-20. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119135819/http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Kepler-20 to http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Kepler-20
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6630AbtJZ?url=http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html to http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)