Talk:Kate Lockley

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Moulton in topic "Didn't invite him in"

"Didn't invite him in" edit

Kate doesn't have to invite Angel in under two circumstances, one is an intermission from The Powers that Be. However, the other is this: when the owner of the residence dies, vampires can come in as they wish, and, considering Kate's condition, she might have been dead for a few seconds. As demonstrated in Buffy, only a brief timespan spent being technically dead is able to work a magic (Kendra being called in that case, Angel going in without being invited first in this case.) Ergo, where I'm going with this is, maybe an added note? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.122.120.244 (talk) 22:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

That argument makes sense to me, but unless it's cited somewhere we can reference, it would be Original Research Jclemens (talk) 22:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know. I just thought I'd put it up here is all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.122.120.244 (talk) 00:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Before Angel knocks down Kate's door, the camera pans over Kate's body, revealing her eyes are closed, her body utterly motionless with no sign of breathing. After Angel knocks down the door, he checks for pulse and breath, but there is no sign of either. The obvious conclusion is that she has technically died. Angel immediately resuscitates her in the shower. This obvious conclusion is confirmed in the dialogue at the end of the episode when Kate says to Angel, "I don't know what I believe, but I - have - faith. - I think maybe we're not alone in this - because I never invited you in." ~Moulton (talk) 04:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:1F06:BEE:0:0:0:101 (talk) Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Detective Kate Lockley.jpg edit

 

Image:Detective Kate Lockley.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Detective Kate Lockley.jpg edit

 

Image:Detective Kate Lockley.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply