This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beyoncé, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beyoncé on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeyoncéWikipedia:WikiProject BeyoncéTemplate:WikiProject BeyoncéBeyoncé articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leona Lewis, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Leona LewisWikipedia:WikiProject Leona LewisTemplate:WikiProject Leona LewisLeona Lewis articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mariah Carey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mariah Carey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mariah CareyWikipedia:WikiProject Mariah CareyTemplate:WikiProject Mariah CareyMariah Carey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Miley Cyrus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Miley Cyrus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Miley CyrusWikipedia:WikiProject Miley CyrusTemplate:WikiProject Miley CyrusMiley Cyrus articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rihanna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rihanna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RihannaWikipedia:WikiProject RihannaTemplate:WikiProject RihannaRihanna articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion
It seems that the multiple singles chronologies were removed for making the page "too messy". I find this reason odd seeing as how the information was tabulated according to an established template, but still, whatever. Anyway, I'm here to make the case for restoring the various singles chronologies, as otherwise, about a dozen different chronologies will find themselves broken up at the point when they get to this song. Thoughts? Opinions? --Jayunderscorezero (talk) 13:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
But putting them would really mess up the page. --Efe (talk) 09:36, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
No it wont if the article longer it wont.
Chronologies for all of these artists is ridiculous. Why not just add the chronologies for every artist in USA for Africa or Band Aid? - eo (talk) 19:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely. Chronologies help but with this very long, certainly is not. --Efe (talk)
The chronologies should go and the song should state that it was made by various artists and not just Mariah Carey. THE evil fluffyface (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
With the nav box and chronologies, the article really looks bad. --Efe (talk) 12:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Note that this single is not credited to each artist, but as a "group". That is, it's not Beyonce/Mariah/Fergie/et. al, but as "Artists Stand Up To Cancer". Therefore, especially considering the number of artists that appear, it's just not feasible. The sidebar/infobox, for example, looks ridiculous. Also, don't most of the single chronology templates allow for a "other singles" section? Can't it just go in there? SKS2K6 (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Should we add a singles chronology for all the artists?
OutbackKidd (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Read/contribute to the discussion above this one instead of making a duplicate. AcroX 22:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
The infoboxes would indeed mess up the page, but what if we added the chronologies in boxes under the main text? Like the boxes which show which song preceded/succeeded a song on the Billboard charts. Just an idea. – Alenshatalk 23:52, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
We have the navigational boxes at the bottom, isn't that enough? Anything else will just be a mass of clutter. AnemoneProjectors 00:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply