Talk:Jumping after Wirkola

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Writing a priori and a posteriori instead of a priori and a posteriori would correspond to the a priori belief that Wirkola's a posteriori stardom was guaranteed by his a priori stardom, each time he jumped, which a posteriori might correspond to a good approximation to the truth, but which nevertheless, in the present encyclopaedic context, would be classified as a non-neutral point of view, so I re-instate the 2nd version. Slavatrudu 10:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic