Talk:Joseph Schwantner: New Morning for the World; Nicolas Flagello: The Passion of Martin Luther King/GA1

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 20:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comments

  • "and was released on the following Martin Luther King, Jr. Day in his honor." could work the wiklink to avoid repeating "Martin Luther King, Jr. Day" thing.
  • Billboard's Classical Albums chart" you've linked Billboard but not their classical chart here, any reason?
    • I cannot find an article specifically for the Classical albums chart. "Top Classical Albums" just redirects to "Billboard charts". --Another Believer (Talk) 15:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "are performed with little pause" I get it but would everyone?
  • Any chance of reception outside of the US?

GAN checklist edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Mostly there besides what I wrote above.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Thank you for taking time to review this article. Please let me know if there are any concerns that still need to be addressed. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
As ever, you're welcome. Let me know when you're done, and I'll re-review. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.