Talk:Joachim Müncheberg/GA3

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dapi89 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 22:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

This article looks in good shape. Some minor bits:

  • Last sentence of "death" is uncited.
  • de Zeng, Stankey & Creek (2007) is not used
  • Isby (2012) is not used
  • Don't see the need to hide the battle/wars in the infobox
  • We normally don't capitalise ranks when then are not used as title.
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

I believe German ranks are always capitalised (I might be wrong but I'm sure enough).
Ok to the rest. Dapi89 (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:  
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: