Talk:Jesse Eisenberg/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MatthewHoobin (talk · contribs) 01:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. I give my props to the uploaders/contributors of the images in this article; they complement the text rather nicely.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Putting this on hold until issues below have been addressed.

Comments

• 1999–2008: Early work: Some of the citations are missing inline author and/or date parametres.

 Done. Mkdw ^talk 02:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

• 2009–11: Breakthrough and critical success: The words sleeper hit should link to the article "Sleeper hit".

 Done by Igordebraga. Mkdw ^talk 02:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

• Upcoming projects: The citations following the sentence This was restated in an interview with ShortList magazine the following month. are missing inline website parametres.

 Done. Mkdw ^talk 02:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

• Plays: The full stop after Asuncion should not be there.

 Done by Igordebraga. Mkdw ^talk 02:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

If the changes are made accordingly, I'd say this article'll be good to go. –Matthew - (talk) 01:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

@MatthewHoobin and KGirlTrucker81: That should be everything. Mkdw ^talk 02:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

To GA status it shall go! –Matthew - (talk) 03:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)