This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.
A fact from Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I presume that "rescission" is actually what is meant in "... concluded that the Truth in Lending Act requires borrowers seeking recession of a loan..." and "... they were not entitled to recession", but since it's mentioned multiple times, I'm not sure. Can someone with better knowledge of law check? Daß Wölf (talk) 21:58, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
You are correct that "rescission" is correct, while "recession" is incorrect. I corrected the four other erroneous appearances of "recession." Thanks for catching this! -- Notecardforfree (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
