Talk:Jenna Ortega/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kj cheetham (talk · contribs) 20:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I'll make a start on this this week. I'll ping when I've done a first pass. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Lead, layout, etc. are fine. Some minor grammar points I'll list below, but good enough for GA as-is.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Has a refs section, which looks fine. Earwig copyvio checker says 29.1%, but looking more closely that's almost all due to quotes.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Major aspects covered, and is on-topic.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No obvious bias.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is relatively stable.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images are all relevant, with suitable captions, though just "Ortega in 20xx" may be slightly too brief. (No alt text, but that's not required for GA.) Images all claim to have a Creative Commons license.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Early life

• "Ortega stated rejections motivated her" to "Ortega stated that rejections motivated her"
  •  Done

Lead

• Oxford comma suggested before the "and" in "for which she received nominations at the Golden Globe, Primetime Emmy and Screen Actors Guild Awards"
  •  Done

2012–2017

• No comma needed after "Ortega made her acting debut in the sitcom Rob (2012)".
  •  Removed

2018–2021

• "Ortega led the high-school drama film" needs clarifying I think.
  • Could you clarify on what needs clarifying??
    •  Question: Led in what way, as in directed/produced/lead cast member, etc. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
      • Revised

2022–present

• Oxford comma suggested before the "and" in "style of speaking and facial expressions"
  •  Done
• Is "the" needed in "episode of the NBC's sketch comedy series"?
  •  Removed

Upcoming projects

• Change "Ortega is set to star" to "Ortega is set to star in"
  •  Done
• Needs a comma after "a dark comedy co-starring Paul Rudd"
  •  Done
• Is "attached" the right word in "Ortega is attached to star in Alba"?
  • I believe it's correct, but probably not the most encyclopaedic, so I've replaced it

Influences

• "She also admired Fanning's sister Elle and followed both of their careers as a child." should have commas either side of "Elle".
  •  Done

Role choices

• "more-varied" doesn't need a hyphen.
  •  Removed
• Change "in 2021 she did not want" to "in 2021 that she did not want".
  •  Done

Personal life

• "more-challenging doesn't need a hyphen.
  •  Removed

General

There's a few instances of quotes following a colon where I'd have used a comma.

I believe that's just a matter of style and is grammatically correct. Pamzeis (talk) 01:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

I'd agree with that. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

I do want to note these are all minor, and not essential to achieve GA. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Sourcing check

Glancing at the sources they look okay overall. Sampling 24 randomly (which I think is more than enough):

13 - interview, but that's fine

18 - this is for Iron Man 3 - but is it your interpretion of it that it's "successful at the box office"? (I personally agree it was successful though, and ref 20 backs it up.)

• I've removed this bit entirely, as it's not really relevant to Ortega's career

23 - ok

25 - ok

29 - ok

33 - ok

45 - ok

48 - is "craves more independence from her parents" enough to say "stubborn" in the article?

• It does say that she's wilful, which essentially means she's stubborn, according to dictionary.com

52 - ok

75 - ok

80 - ok

94 - ok

95 - ok

103 - ok

110 - ok

120 - self-published by Ty Burr, but I think that's ok in this case.

129 - ok

180 - ok

181 - ok

194 - ok

197 - ok

200 - ok

202 - ok

210 - ok

Pamzeis, All my comments are very minor really, so I have to say well done for this overall! I've give you chance to respond to things before, but I think it's almost ready to be marked as GA. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

@Kj cheetham: Thanks for your comments :) I've responded to the above. Pamzeis (talk) 14:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

All good to me now, good work! -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.