Talk:Jelly Roll Morton: The Complete Library of Congress Recordings

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Jazz High‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The title of this article is incorrect: it should read: Jelly Roll Morton: The Complete Library of Congress Recordings. However it is listed as The Complete Library of Congress Recordings on Amazon as here.Mballen (talk) 05:08, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Actually, Rounder Records (who released the box set) refer to it as The Complete Library of Congress Recordings on their website. It does say "Jelly Roll Morton" on the front cover, but that's not any different from most other albums (i.e., displaying the name of the performing artist on the front cover). On the other hand, the text on the cover says The Complete Library of Congress Recordings by Alan Lomax; similarly, a single CD representing the "highlights" of the set is called The Library of Congress Recordings by Alan Lomax. But I don't see anyone (Rounder, allmusic, etc.) really using the longer title. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Titles are not copyrighted so it doesn't matter if other albums have the same title. Also there is a lot of leeway in Wikipedia's use of titles. It seems to me that the title is as present far too general to be encyclopedic and should be corrected though I am not sure how to do that. It doesn't matter a whit, BTW what Rounder Records (now defunct) says or said on its website. Mballen (talk) 00:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic