Talk:Jaynes–Cummings model
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Jaynes-Cummings model page were merged into Jaynes–Cummings model. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (August 2018) |
ħν? edit
Im not sure about this, so i don't want to make any changes myself, but it seems strange that ν (nu), generally used as the symbol for frequency is being used to represent an angular frequency. Wouldn't ω1 and ω2 or something similar be better? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.216.54.172 (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
yeah, it is worrysome edit
I was also thinking about that. One should use different notations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farid2053 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Not Standard edit
ω is the standard character used in the literature. This article seems pretty mess too. If I get the time I'm inclined to rewrite this. --129.11.77.198 (talk) 08:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Minus missing edit
Okay, I have no idea how editing stuff works, but comapared to Cohen-Tannoudji there should be a minus in the arctan(). So someone might want to change: arctan(...) -> arctan(- ...)
134.60.83.75 (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Merger proposal edit
It seems the Jaynes-Cummings model page is essentially a duplicate of this page, with a misspelling (“-” instead of “–”). The content is slightly different, but I am pretty certain the same model is being referred to on both pages. The title figure is even the same. There is some non-duplicate content, though, so that might be merged in somehow, and notation would probably have to be made consistent throughout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MYT (talk • contribs) 11 May 2018 (UTC)