Talk:Iven Mackay/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by AustralianRupert in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk · contribs) 22:57, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I will review this article against the GA criteria. I will try to post some comments here today, but am having some connection issues at the moment, so if it takes a couple of days please accept my apologies. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:57, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

General comments

Overall, this is an excellent article. I have a few observations, not necessarily all tied to the GA criteria:

Criteria
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  • Issues rectified above.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • Well referenced article, using high-quality reliable sources. No OR that I could see.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • Issues rectified above.
  • No issues.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  • No issues.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):   d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:  
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail: