Talk:Iraqi Lurs

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Ahmedo Semsurî in topic Interation of the page in Feyli Lurs

This article has considered all of Shi'it Kurds of Iraq as Lurs. In Iraqi Kurdistan and also in Arab part of the country There are Feyli Kurd communities in Baqdad, Khanaghin, Badra, Mandeli, Kut, Meysan (Ali Sharghi and ALi Gharbi) and Kirkouk. But Lur people are only live in east suburb of Kut city in Wasit province in a community of about 20-40 thousands, and they're separate from Kurds and also Shi'it Feyli Kurds. This article also uses wrong, illusory and deceptive references to mislead readers. I think this is a political attempt from Iranian Shi'it regim to detach Shi'it Kurds from other parts of Kurdistan and creating a Shi'it community in that very strategic region. Unfortunately there isn't any trustworthy and scientific refrences about the real Lurs live in east of Kut city, and there isn't any way to rewrite this article on the basis of reliable references, so I think it should be deleted just like the Farsi edition of that.Paraw (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

/* Feylis */ edit

It doesn't make sense to suggest that the Iranian regime is behind this wiki article when feylis in Iraq being kurds or lurs doesn't benefit Iran in any way and there is already also an article for feyli Kurds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.52.187.17 (talk) 21:03, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Interation of the page in Feyli Lurs edit

Iraqi Lurs are a part of Feyli Lurs inhabited in Iraq. It is completely clear that a significant part of the Feyli Lurs are inhabited in Western Iran.To integrate the page in Feylis page is not rational because they are just a part of Lurs and the Lurs mainly live in Iran.SHADEGAN (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Shadegan: You are still ignoring any constructive interaction with other users. If you disagree with the information stated in Feylis, use Talk:Feylis. --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 12:26, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Ahmedo Semsurî:; please bring your reasoning to deleting and integration of the page Iraqi Lurs here on it's talk page please. To delete a sourceful page needs a strong logic and reasoning. SHADEGAN (talk) 12:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
'sourceful page'? Most of the information on Iraqi Lurs is a pov-push and based on unreliable and unacademic sources[1][2][3]. Even the title is a POV-push, read Feylis and Feylis#Iraq_and_Kurdistan_Region --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
and what does this even mean? --> They know themselves as Feylis and also Feyli Kurds. However, they are considered as Kurdish Lurs[6][7] by themselves. A clear contradiction. --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 13:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
These are not good reasons to integrate a page at all? Do you have a logic to integrate it in Feylis page?SHADEGAN (talk) 13:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
This page is based on unreliable, unattainable and dead links. The info in Feylis is using mostly using academia. It's not a question of integrating, its a question of having a very misleading page redirected. --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 13:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Why didnt you try to modify the contents instead of deleteling the page?? Do you have a problem with the page name?SHADEGAN (talk) 13:20, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
I did clean up a lot of POV-pushing on Kurdish related pages, including this which is basically a rubbish version of Feylis. --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 13:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Have you seen the page Flag of Kurdistan? Is it a ealstic page? Is that flag accepted by all Kurdish parties in Turkey, Syria etc.? There are lots of Kurdish pages that are ful of mistakes. You have omitted a lot of contents in your recent edits that are completely reliable.SHADEGAN (talk) 13:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Why is Flag of Kurdistan not realistic? The only thing you have done so far is to claim things without evidence. If you have problems with my edits, please explain which and why. --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

This seems like a waste of time with Shadegan not being able to explain why this article despite its profound issues should not be a redirect. --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply