Talk:Intro (End of the World)
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Pollosito in topic GA Review
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 April 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intro (End of the World) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Intro (End of the World) was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 17, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Intro (End of the World)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 13:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 19:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hi again, @Gained. I've been more engaged lately, but I'll review this article as soon as possible. In addition, I see that it is very easy to review, so it will save me work. I won't be as instantaneous as I was in my first three reviews (in fact, I have another article to review simultaneously), so I ask for your patience in the process. Thanks and best, Santi (talk) 19:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey again @Pollosito! Thanks for choosing this article to review and it's really nice to see you doing more GA reviews. I'm personally not going to be that busy for the rest of the month but take as much time as you need. Gained (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, @Pollosito and @Gained. This is a courtesy ping to let you know I have redirected the article back to Eternal Sunshine (album). This article fails WP:NSONG; most of the sources used are from album reviews. Sincere apologies for this, as I recognize the well-done effort it took to write the page. PSA 🏕️ (talk) 13:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pollosito Now that there's a deletion discussion for the article, I'd like to fail this GAN as it violates the "Stable" aspect of the GA criteria. Gained (talk) 14:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Gained: I agree. @PSA, thank you for the info given regarding the article. I hadn't realized this because I didn't have enough time to review it. It makes me sad that this article has the potential to be deleted for not having independent sources. So I'll close this review and it can be nominated again if it stays. Santi (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)