Talk:Interstate TDR/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by The Bushranger in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: wackywace 08:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I will review the article, and will post any findings within the next few days. wackywace 08:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply


General
Fixed. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Lead
  • Please use — for dashes, instead of using the ordinary dash sign.
Fixed. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "...against the Japanese, but due to continued development problems, combined with conventional weapons proving to be adequate, the program was canceled." This middle bit is a bit awkward. I think this might be better: "The type saw some service in the Pacific Theater against the Japanese, but the program was canceled following continued development problems, and after conventional weapons proved to be adequate." Feel free to come up with another idea if you don't think that reads very well.
Went with a slightly different rewrite idea, hope it works? - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Even better! wackywace 18:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Design and development
  • In the lead "assault drone" is in double quotes, in Design and development, it is in single quotes. Consistency here would maximise readability.
Fixed. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Aircraft on display
  • It would be good to split the Florida link, so instead of "[[Pensacola, Florida]]", you would have "[[Pensacola, Florida|Pensacola]], [[Florida]]".
Fixed. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Variants and operators
  • Just a quiery, but why are their spaces between the end of the lines and the references? I haven't seen it on any other aircraft articles, but if it is personal preference then I have no issues with it.
That was actually a slip on my part, it looks better without them, so I've fixed that. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall, a very good article on a topic that (judging by the number of references) is poorly-covered elsewhere. Once the issues have been addressed, I will be happy to pass the article. Good work. wackywace 08:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 16:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
All issues have been addressed; I am happy to pass this article. wackywace 18:27, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks! ^_^ - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 19:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply