Talk:Indira Gandhi International Airport/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Vincent60030 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vincent60030 (talk · contribs) 06:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I suppose it has a potential to be a good article, but there's still in need of improvements.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:  
    There is still lack of references at the bottom few sections, especially with an unreferenced area tag
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
    Good!
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
    Some images have captions that are not precise, such as an awkward caption 'thumb'. Also, there are too many images at the bottom half part of the article.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Good try! My suggestions are to improve on references, provide suitable captions for the images used and try to reduce the images at the bottom half part of the article. :)