Talk:Impossible world

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Logic

possible vs. impossible edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This definition is hilarious. A thing (an impossible world) is exactly the same thing as something else (a possible world), except that it is different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.72.191.171 (talk) 06:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

impossible is not strictly non-normal edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

there is exactly 4 kinds of impossible worlds and non-normal is only a part of this, please rewrite the whole thing because it only talks about non-normal worlds which only deals with logic but impossible worlds are not only about logic, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.143.178.204 (talk) 11:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic