 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
My review edit
I will perform a review on your draft, which by no means will be complete nor thorough, and will require of additional editing by other contributors. Although the company is a commercial entity, the introduction is overly promotional rather than descriptive. I will try to "Wikify" that and some other entries, but please consider it just as a start of the procedure, not approval.
Some points that need addressing:
- While references by ESA are useful and bring undeniable legitimacy, I would like to see references from the mass media to further support WP:Notability.
- The modules are not spacecraft but seem to be miniature labs restricted to the interior of the ISS, so it is not "true outer space exposure". I think that "Space science" is a better descriptor than "Aerospace" company.
Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- @FKE94: Hello. Is there a standard hardware, volume, or size for the cubes? I think the article needs to better describe the basic unit (cube) and how it facilitates the modularity and their incorporation to the "plug-ins" onboard the ISS. Is the modularity concept analogous to CubeSats? (see section below). A reference supporting such info will be need. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
CubeSat edit
The pictures make the cubes look like CubeSats, though clearly they don't have the same ability to live outdoors, independently. Should the similarities and differences be discussed? Jim.henderson (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2019 (UTC)