Talk:Hurricane Lisa (1998)/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Juliancolton in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 18:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article. My only, really picky, comment is that in the storm track image the top dot got partially chopped off - this has absolutely no bearing on GA status thought, and so congrats on another Good Article! Dana boomer (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I'll see what I can do about the track map. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply