Talk:Hurricane Kate (2015)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with 2015 Atlantic hurricane season on 24 February 2024. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
Merge?
editMH is short, and the impact is poorly sources. Not convinced there is enough content for a stand alone article at this time. YE Pacific Hurricane 04:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- I am currently working on expanding both the MH and impacts (particularly Bahamas as well), so I'd wait until that is done. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 20:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- Well, maybe save your trouble. Have you found any information for Kate that isn't in the season article? You describe the Bahamas impacts as basically a non-event. If there was a connection to Joaquin, then maybe the article could stay. Likewise, there is minimal damage in Bermuda. The Irish stuff probably shouldn't be here, since Kate was absorbed by a larger extratropical storm well before it affected Europe. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
@MarioProtIV: - I just wanted to check, have you gotten your messages on your own talk page? There are a lot of editors who would love to help you out as an editor (myself included). If not, check User talk:MarioProtIV. If you have, maybe consider looking through this page in the future - Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/Tables. It's a directory of all of the articles in the tropical cyclone project. Ones that are colored orange or red need work the most, and your editing talents would be much more useful for an existing article than trying to make a new article that isn't needed. I can tell you will be a talented editor one day :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Kate (2015). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117071144/http://www.weatherscientific.co.uk/2015/11/13/post-tropical-kate-to-bring-flood-risk-gales-this-weekend/ to http://www.weatherscientific.co.uk/2015/11/13/post-tropical-kate-to-bring-flood-risk-gales-this-weekend/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151121161453/http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/flooding-fallen-trees-block-roads-10452294 to http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local-news/flooding-fallen-trees-block-roads-10452294
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)